Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice to your legal rights with the parties, arising out from the over marriage in the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees use.
As the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it truly is made crystal clear that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-field duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner together with private respondents and will just take care of all the components of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with check here set up legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling to the same variety of case.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the legislation laid down from the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of your parent department from the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Any court may perhaps request to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.
8. For the reasons stated above, this court finds the petition being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Consequently acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.